Home > Uncategorized > My Idea, Let Me Show You It

My Idea, Let Me Show You It

Via Balloon Juice we hear that Bill “Reverse-Cassandra” Kristol is hard at work trying to convince the conservative intelligentsia, such as it is, that Sarah Palin’s latest word-flub, refudiate, should become an accepted part of our language.

In true Kristol form, he omits important context, suggesting that Palin’s error occured in the “heat of the tweeting moment.”  Which would be plausible, if not for the fact that she had used the exact same non-word the day before in a segment on Fox News.

People are prone to mispronouncing words they’ve seen in print but are not familiar with hearing in spoken language.  But when you follow up a “mispronunciation” by writing out the non-word, it becomes quite clear that you’re not aware that it isn’t a word.  People who read a lot and encounter words they don’t usually use in speech still know how the words are spelled.  You’d expect that someone who reads “all of ’em” would have encountered the particular word she was flailing for; clearly she had not.

It seems obvious to me that what happened was that Our Sarah picked up a bright-n-shiny new word object, floated it as a trial balloon on O’Reilly’s show, and since no one pointed out to her that it wasn’t a word, she decided to use it again right away.  After all, those multi-syllable words make you sound smart and all of that, you betcha.

After the twit tweeted her new word toy and the feedback ridicule started pouring in in response, she deleted the tweet – then came back a bit later with the Pee-Wee Herman “I meant to do that” defense, comparing herself to perhaps the most prolific English-word inventor…William Shakespeare.

Look, I’m not a dead-language proponent here – I make up words and constructions all the time myself.  The difference is, I know when I’m doing it (see “smited”).  Is it really too much to ask that the people who invent our new words be fluent and literate in the language they are “improving” with their modifications?

But back to Kristol:  first off, Billy, no matter what you do, no matter what you say, Sarah is never, ever, ever, going to touch your penis.  This is a fool’s errand you’re on here, and while I can’t think of anyone better to carry out a fool’s errand, let’s not get our hopes up too high, mmmkay?  Secondly, if there is anyone who decidely does NOT need the help of a guy who’s always wrong, it would be Sarah Palin.  She can manage “wrong” all by herself.

So let’s put your efforts to something a bit more useful – something that will both satisfy your Palin-stroking … urges, while at the same time, help give a boost to Sarah’s newest constituency, the “Mama Grizzlies.”  I think they need a logo, some public brand to appeal to all those Mama Grizzly-wannabees out there.  Something not too ferocious – the name covers that angle – but something cuddly, non-threatening, appealing, and approachable.  Something … like this:

Mama Grizzlies for Palin

So whaddya say, Bill?  You’ve been the shit-Svengali behind Sarah’s inexplicable rise to political stardom; she trusts your judgement and will welcome your input on this.  For our part, we’ll be happy to give the image to you, and the Mama Grizzlies, gratis – and since it wasn’t your idea to begin with, the odds are pretty good that it’s not a wrong one.  We know how much it means to you to be able to provide the sure-footed guidance and support Sarah will need as she flails her way towards 2012.  All you’ve gotta do is pick up the ball and run with it.

Please, please, run with it.

Advertisements
  1. StringonaStick
    July 27, 2010 at 4:43 pm

    Now, put some high heels and a Bumpit on that mamma grizzy drawing and he won’t be able to, uh, control himself. Crap, I feel sick…

  2. July 27, 2010 at 7:17 pm

    Pedobear for The Refudiation!!!
    ~

  3. BDay
    July 27, 2010 at 8:33 pm

    There you go, acting all Eurotrash again with your Brit-spelling of “judgment.”

    • jennofark
      July 27, 2010 at 10:55 pm

      Yeah. But like I said, unlike Palin, I know it’s not the predominate way of spelling it in this country, and also know why everyone who spells it that way is wrong.

  4. July 27, 2010 at 10:59 pm

    I’m thinking Mama Griz there needs a pink bow in her hair.

    • jennofark
      July 27, 2010 at 11:11 pm

      Cleanup on aisle six…

      …anyone out there who unlike me is not completely clueless w/r/t photoshop, could we get a bumpit AND a bow? And some Manolos, too, if you can swing it. Also too, a pair of rimless librarian specs would be nice.

      You know, it’s so important to project a consistent image right from the get-go when you’re building your brand.

  5. CrankyOldMan
    July 29, 2010 at 8:05 pm

    The skewering of Wm. Kristol is priceless! Oh sure, you can say it “practically writes itself”…but modesty doesn’t become you.

  6. herr doktor bimler
    July 30, 2010 at 7:01 am

    but something cuddly, non-threatening, appealing, and approachable. Something … like this:

    I was hinting in that direction when I suggested in a Sadly,No! comment that Palin would be better-off claiming Lewis Carroll as a precedent (rather than Shakespeare), but no-one picked up on it.

  7. CrankyOldMan
    August 3, 2010 at 2:42 am

    Hmmm…wonder if SarahP misread “brillig”? I must say “slithy toves” fits her well, eh? Kinda slimy and swamplike…skanky, even?

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: